Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 1 (fast):
Content search 2:
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Assessment, Memories, Ridges - Demo - Acceptance Level Processing (1ACC-36) - L531027b | Сравнить
- Assessment, Memories, Ridges - Demo - Acceptance Level Processing (Cont.) (1ACC-37) - L531027c | Сравнить
- Case Reports, SOP 8-C, SOP 8-L (1ACC-38) - L531027d | Сравнить
- Fixed Attention, Duplication, How to Audit Children (1ACC-35) - L531027a | Сравнить

CONTENTS ASSESSMENT, MEMORIES, RIDGES: DEMO: ACCEPTANCE LEVEL PROCESSING Cохранить документ себе Скачать
1st ACC - 371st ACC - 36
Transcript of lecture by L. Ron Hubbard AICL-38 renumbered 19B and again renumbered 37 for the "Exteriorization and the Phenomena of Space" cassette series.Transcript of lecture by L. Ron Hubbard AICL-37 renumbered 19A and again renumbered 36 for the "Exteriorization and the Phenomena of Space" cassette series.

ASSESSMENT, MEMORIES, RIDGES: DEMO: ACCEPTANCE LEVEL PROCESSING (CONTINUED)

Also see the additional note
A lecture and auditing demonstration given on 27 October 1953

ASSESSMENT, MEMORIES, RIDGES: DEMO: ACCEPTANCE LEVEL PROCESSING

[Based on the clearsound version only.]A lecture and demonstration given on 27 October 1953

[Based on the clearsound version only.]
LRH: All right. Now start accepting evil eyes.


PC: Yes. Yeah.

Okay. And this is the afternoon lecture of October the 27th.

LRH: Get evil eyes that are bloodshot.

This afternoon we're going to take up something on the order of Acceptance Level Processing. I said I would take some of this up earlier and actually, one way or another, have been taking it up because it all comes down to "have" and "not-have" when we finish up with the integration.

PC: Mm-hm.

If you have anchor points, you have space; but you're not likely to have much space unless you have some anchor points; but it is a scarcity of space; but it still comes into a havingness as far as space is concerned. And you get this entire problem interwound within itself.

LRH: Can you accept that?

Actually, the instantaneous fact - if you can imagine an instantaneous fact - the instantaneous fact is space, anchor points, nothingness and somethingness combined. And that instantaneous fact, added to it the ingredient called theta, and you've got life and its performance.

PC: Not bloodshot, preferably.

The ingredient called theta is seldom visible to the common public. The main reason it's not visible to the common public is they don't look. Now, it may or may not be true that theta is nothing and MEST is something. This was the theory which brought us into the techniques which we are now using. A theory is as good as it will take you, and the theta-MEST theory is still taking us places.

LRH: Oh? Very clear, beautiful evil eyes.

That theory is simply that - that theta is a static in terms of this universe, which means that it has no wavelength, no dimension, so forth.

PC: Just plain evil eyes. Yeah!

Oddly enough, after I'd defined this, I suddenly recalled the definitions for zero. And what do you know, mathematics had never defined zero and we had mathematicians dealing with a wild variable continually. Was it a past, present or future zero? Was it a zero of geographical location? Was it a zero - a zero of something? So if we had a zero of something we were postulating continually a mathematical absolute, and it was just about as usable as it has turned out to be true. In other words, the mathematical zero is not true. Therefore, you can expect theta, as a theoretical zero, to suddenly develop at any time - a somethingness.

LRH: Just plain evil eyes.

And the more you start unveiling a case, and the more you start picking up the lines and getting him back to look where he all of a sudden says quite happily, "Well, there's nothing there," if it's close to the end of a session, you just leave it at that. But if there's really nothing there, you'd keep mocking up "nothing there" and fooling with this thing and going around and walking around and looking at it and forgetting about it and coming back to it again and so forth.

PC: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah!

Because any time anybody traced a communication line which wound up in nothing, he has hit something which hasn't enough body for him to perceive at the moment you're processing him. You've simply exceeded his ability to shift wavelength, and that is all. And when you have exceeded his ability to shift wavelength, you have simply and plainly and flatly come up against a "No, I won't look." That's about all there is to processing is find the nothingnesses and get something there, take the somethingnesses and get nothing there and everything reduces back and next thing you know, why, you have things pretty well straightened out.

LRH: Get beautiful evil eyes.

So you have an instantaneous fact in operation all through cases. And cases are prone to shift and change on you from session to session.

PC: Yeah. Mm-hm.

A great many sessions of very short duration is superior to a few sessions of very long duration. A pc has a tendency after a half an hour or an hour to fog up a little bit, one way or the other, in the hands of most auditors. Let's qualify it. If the auditor is on the ball, the pc never gets a chance to. The auditor conceives that there are nothingnesses around which ought to have somethingnesses in them and immediately begins to build back the missing items in the case. So we're up against the problem of restoration of havingness, aren't we?

LRH: Accept a lot of those.

You might think that processing consists mainly of reducing everything to nothing. A V is doing that. But this is not true. Actually, processing consists of restoring havingness. We run somebody up to the other end, we say, "Take a look at your body now. Do you see a communication line? All right. Where does it go? Well, just run up on the line and see where it is. What do you got there? Well, that's very interesting. That's fine. Duplicate it, duplicate it, duplicate it, duplicate it, blow it up. All right. Now, duplicate it a couple more times and blow it up. Yank the line and throw it away. Okay. Got another line? All right, trace that up." Follow-follow-follow-follow...

Now let's accept enough guilt to let you look.

"Well, what do you know, there's nothing here! Uh-oh! Oh-oh!" You get the handling of lines? "Nothing there."

PC: Hm.

"All right, put nothing there. Put nothing there."

LRH: What kind of guilt does it have to be?

There's a lot of ways to handle this, by the way, just tons of ways. The more surprising ways you think of to handle it, the faster your preclear will work, too, because he gets (quote) onto your tricks after a while (unquote) and realizes that you are (quote) forcing him to look (unquote). And he'll play along with you. And you may be processing somebody for several minutes before you suddenly realize that, gee, he's doing a royal dodge on you. He just isn't looking. And he's bouncing all around and skittering all around something and trying to find something that is sufficiently consequential to attract the auditor's attention - sufficiently consequential to attract the auditor's attention - and not sufficiently consequential to suddenly blow him into the middle of next week. See, it becomes a contest, then, of the auditor persuading the preclear to look and the preclear's contest persuading the auditor not to let him look. And this, downscale, is why cases have a rough time of it sometimes - the restoration of havingness. Therefore, Acceptance Level Processing should be something that you understand very, very well.

PC: Oh, just sort of nameless "uhhh."

A lot of your people out in the field, now, they've heard of Acceptance Level Processing. They're going to get, pretty soon, three PABs - I think PAB 13, 14 and 15 are Acceptance Level Processing. PAB 12 is explosions. It doesn't give them all the dope on explosions but it'll make them happy for a while. It gives them all anybody would care to handle at the moment. But 13, 14 and 15 are devoted to the character and so forth of man and Acceptance Level Processing.

LRH: All right. Just let that nameless "uhhh" having happened to you. Mock it up and let it happen to you.

Now, you understand that Acceptance Level Processing is a tool to develop understanding, primarily, and secondarily, a tool for auditing. You get that? That's SOP 8-L. Acceptance Level Processing shifts in and Expanded GTTA goes out. SOP 8-L: What is the acceptance level of the pc? We determine this by the fact that he has vacuums sitting all around that will soak up one kind of item - there's a hunger. What you can say about the pc is that he's hungry. What you can say about any pc is that he's hungry. But you as an auditor have to find out "for what." He's hungry for the damnedest things.

PC: Mm-hm.

People come in, they look gaunt, they look starved, like that fellow you processed yesterday - real gaunt, see? Now, if you'd suddenly started to - now, that's why I say "secondarily processing," you understand - because if you'd started to satiate his hungers, yeoow! You'd have just been at it and at it and at it. Furthermore you would've jarred his bank up to such an extent that he wouldn't have exteriorized easily. See?

LRH: And now put it on the time track as having happened to you in lots of quantity.

But if he hadn't exteriorized right when he did, after you did what you did - a few explosions, you exteriorized him, and you went on and worked him; the case got a lot better That's the right way to go about it. But if he hadn't exteriorized and he hadn't exteriorized and he hadn't ex- he's hungry for something. He's so hungry for something that he just can't let go of what he's got, it's so scarce, it's so rare, it's so unhaveable. In other words, something has escaped his ability to have. And the second it's escaped his ability to have, he'd hold on to any shadow of it. And a mock-up on an inverted dynamic is a shadow of something he can't have. And a missing mock-up is something that just doesn't exist, it's so rare. See?

PC: Hm. I guess I can have lots of that.

So, when we find the blank and the nothingness when we're tracing lines - we have nothing - it's something that's so scarce that he can't have it. Whatever computation went with it, who cares. It's some form, some aesthetic, some something, which is a nothing as far as the preclear is concerned.

LRH: You can have lots of it, huh?

All right. What does this have to do with a case who is interiorized? It's a case of havingness. You ask this pc to take a look at his body. Does he take a look at his body? Nnnn. He can't see his body. Now, just tie this up with running up the end of a communication line and finding no terminal. And then you work with a terminal and you work with a terminal and you work with a terminal; all of a sudden he develops a terminal. Isn't this strange?

PC: Yes.

Well, how do you do this? You put up nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing. Now blow up some nothings. If you really wanted to work hard at this, it gets very silly. You say, "Blow up some nothings." Okay, he blows up some nothings happily because he knows "nothing" can't blow up.

LRH: Good.

And then you get nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, duplicate, duplicate, duplicate, dupli- . "Now blow those up." "Hah! All right, there's nothing there." Duplicate, duplicate, duplicate, duplicate, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing. "Now, now blow that up." "Wait a minute. There's the most curious thing here." It suddenly strikes him, now he's going to be curious about it. And he'll fight and fend around and talk about it and argue and so on. Well, you just keep him at work on duplicating whatever he's got there and blowing it up until eventually he realizes he's destroying something at the same time he's creating it. You ask him to duplicate it, so he can create it. "Well, blow up the duplicate." Well, he can destroy it. If he can create and destroy it, it can't be senior to him and it can't be dangerous to him, so therefore, "Well, let's take a look at the damn thing!" See, if we just go in on a gradient scale this way.

All right. Let's get a sharper form of guilt that you've been paid back in, such as your eyes being put out. Is that acceptable to you - your eyes being put out?

Well, what's this got to do with a fellow who's in his body and can't get out? Here's a question of havingness. What's this got to do with Acceptance Level Processing? A great deal. Because if you were to sit down and just shoot Acceptance Level Processing at a preclear, just hour after hour after hour, you'd practically shatter him. You'd practically finish him. It's lots of fun but he would get so bogged that you'd probably have a hard time bailing him out because he starts to go to pieces physically if he's nailed down in a body and you start running Acceptance Level Processing.

PC: No.

But sometimes, sometimes on one of these cases you start running Acceptance Level Processing and he will have a scarcity of something that is so apparent, right there, that it'll blow. And you can see how this is. He's nothing on the other end of a communication line. There's him to the body, see? There he is, there the body is with a collapsed terminal in between.

LRH: That isn't acceptable to you?

Now, the body essentially is a something with a nothing on the other end of a collapsed terminal - a thetan. And basically, he can't look at himself. That's where the nothing is.

PC: No.

All right. Let's just try this, just as a little stunt.

LRH: Well, good. How about putting on your time track all the blobs that you made out of things that had been beautiful just by looking at them.

LRH: All right, John, put nothing behind your head. Nothing there again.

PC: Yeah.

Well, let's duplicate it. Let's duplicate it again. Let's duplicate it again. Duplicate it again. Duplicate...

LRH: All right. Let's put lots of that blob that you have upset there, ruined. All - get everything precious you ever had being blobbed by having looked at it.

PC: What do you want me to do with the duplicates?

Got enough of them?

LRH: All right, just get a lot of duplicates there. Duplicates of nothing back of your head. Now, blow them all up. What do you get?

PC: Well, there's dozens of things I haven't even explored yet.

PC: What do you think?

LRH: Well, get - get everybody cursing you, too, at the same time.

LRH: Well, what do you - what do...

PC: It's awfully funny, you know. It's just like in the fairy tales.

PC: Nothing!

LRH: What's the matter?

LRH: Okay. Now, is that real good, having nothing there, or bad?

PC: Well, they're humorous sort of little curses.

PC: I don't know.

LRH: Well, get lots of curses.

LRH: All right, let's put nothing back of your head again. Now, let's duplicate it.

PC: Yes.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Just pile it with lots of curses.

LRH: Duplicate it again. Again. Again. Again. Can you duplicate it easily?

PC: Yes.

PC: No, it takes a little longer than that.

LRH: I mean, strung up and down your track.

LRH: Oh, it's-it's...

PC: Yes.

PC: It takes long enough to think it.

LRH: Tremendous numbers of curses.

LRH: ... is it slowing down?

PC: Oh, dear!

PC: No. It takes long enough to think of it.

LRH: Enough motivators there - got to have enough motivators.

LRH: Oh, you have to have time to think. That's right.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Evidently.

LRH: Get having had to be serious for eight million years.

LRH: Okay. Get some duplicates there of nothing.

That's acceptable as a punishment?

PC: I've got about ten.

PC: No!

LRH: Blow them all up!

LRH: No, it isn't acceptable.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: No. It isn't.

LRH: What happens as you do this?

LRH: How about being tickled for eight million years? Is that acceptable?

PC: Oh, I feel a little shift.

PC: Not quite.

LRH: Mm-hm. All right. Let's put nothing back of your head. Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. Now blow that up.

LRH: Not quite. What do you find there?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Well, I was just thinking of some more things to melt down into blobs by looking at them.

LRH: Now what do you got?

LRH: Oh, all the sensation that you've desired, all the way along the track, melted into a blob because you have desired it.

PC: Nothing.

PC: All the sensations?

LRH: Nothing. Good. Let's take that nothing and duplicate it. Duplicate it. Duplicate it. Duplicate it. Now what do you got?

LRH: Yeah, all the beautiful sensations you could have had, but they just melted into a blob and were unsensationable when you received them by looking at them.

PC: A lot of duplicates of nothing.

PC: Well, that'd be horrible.

LRH: Blow them up.

LRH: That's horrible? Is it acceptable as a motivator?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Mm, no.

LRH: Okay. Let's put - what do you got there now?

LRR: Supposing this had happened to you for two billion years.

PC: Nothing. LRR: All right. Let's duplicate it.

PC: Oh, God! Well, it'd make a wonderful motivator!

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Is it acceptable as a motivator?

LRH: Duplicate it.

PC: Yeah, I guess as a motivator it is.

PC: I'm just keeping right on duplicating.

LRH: Well, just strew the track with it for a couple of billion years.

LRH: All right. Smash all those duplicates together with a terrific bang.

Get - get being associated with people who wouldn't let you look for a long time as a motivator.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Mm.

LRH: What happened?

LRH: Get wearing horse's blinders since 1938 as a motivator.

PC: I feel like I've come up to the front of my face.

What you got?

LRH: Well, let's put nothing there again.

PC: Yeah, as a motivator; if the period were over; it wouldn't be so bad to have it.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: If the period were over?

LRH: And again. Now duplicate those two nothings.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Well, get motivators in the past only.

LRH: More duplicates.

PC: All right.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Okay. Now let's be well up and take a look around.

LRH: More duplicates.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: What'd you see?

LRH: More duplicates. More duplicates. Now smash all those together violently.

PC: Mm. Well, I'm just taking a look at the back of the room.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: What'd you see? Vision improved any or worse or...?

LRH: Now, what do you get with that?

PC: It's a bit better.

PC: Nothing

LRH: A little bit better.

LRH: Nothing again. Good. Let's put some nothing in back of your head. Got it?

PC: It's getting a little better today. I just noticed I have some vision of my own.

PC: Yeah, got lots of them.

LRH: Mm-hm. Well, good. Good. We won't tamper with it then. Let's just get that as a motivator. Let's get your vision being so carefully handled that nobody'd dare tamper with it - that as a motivator.

LRH: Got a lot of them. Smash them together again. Now what do you got?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: I haven't quite got them smashed yet.

LRH: Mm-hm. Acceptable motivator?

LRH: Well, it's easy to smash, they're all nothing.

PC: Gee, Pm not sure.

PC: I know that.

LRH: Well, how about - how about denying yourself vision?

LRH: Well, duplicate what you haven't got smashed now.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Well, let's get large boxes of that - self-denial on vision.

LRH: Duplicate it again.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Large boxes of it. They contain the beautiful things you could look at, but you better not.

LRH: And again.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Denying yourself looking.

LRH: And again.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Big boxes of this.

LRH: And again. And again. Now slap all those together real hard.

PC: Uh-huh.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: All over the place.

LRH: Got that?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Fill the street with them.

LRH: Did they go together more easily that time? Good. Now, let's mock up nothing right where you are.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: All right. Fill the river full of them.

LRH: Nothing again.

PC: Hm.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Now explode them all without looking at them.

LRH: Nothing again - just in the space coincident with your thinkingness.

PC: I can't bear to do that! Are you... Oh! Well, I can do it if I can look at the explosion.

PC: Oh, not duplicating it.

LRH: You can look at the explosion.

LRH: All right. Space coincident with your thinkingness.

PC: But you don't want me looking at the explosion.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: You can look at the explosion.

LRH: All right. Duplicate what you've got there.

PC: Oh, okay. Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: That's easy. Vision a little better?

LRH: Duplicate it again.

PC: It's possible.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Mm? Possibility?

LRH: Duplicate it again.

PC: I haven't checked around yet today to see if I can see close up pretty well.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Hm?

LRH: Again. Smash all those in.

PC: I haven't checked it enough to see if I can see very well.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Oh, get being - get nearsightedness as a punishment.

LRH: What happens?

PC: Yeah.

PC: Well, it just seems like a little tiny black point.

LRH: Let's get more nearsightedness.

LRH: Oh? Curious. Let's duplicate it. Let's duplicate it again.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: More nearsightedness.

LRH: Let's duplicate it.

PC: Yes.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Lots of nearsightedness.

LRH: Duplicate it.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: This could go on for about two hours and I'd have enough to fill up a cubic centimeter.

LRH: Now throw nearsightedness out in front of you and see who accepts it.

LRH: Oh, I see. They're this tiny, huh?

PC: Well, I get Aunt Millie accepting it. I think she's actually farsighted.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Well, just feed her nearsightedness until she's satisfied.

LRH: All right. Say you've gone for two hours now and have a cubic centimeter of it.

PC: Sure does counterbalance her farsightedness here. Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm, pepper.

LRH: Well, get her accepting nearsightedness...

LRH: Got it?

PC: Mm-hm. Mm-hm.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: ... until she's completely satisfied.

LRH: All right. Come down on it real hard from all sides and smash it in on itself.

PC: Yeah, I think she's about getting balanced now.

PC: It won't smash.

LRH: Throw out some more nearsightedness in another direction and see if somebody else finds - accepts it.

LRH: It doesn't smash? Well, make a duplicate of what didn't smash.

PC: No. I suppose some of the others might -because the other people are farsighted in my family...

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Now get the fact that the whole society wears clothes as an overt act against you.

LRH: And a duplicate of that.

PC: Yes.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: That's not anything personal in that. Nearly anybody will accept that as an overt act.

LRH: And a duplicate of that.

PC: Yes!

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Right? Got it?

LRH: A duplicate of that.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Okay. Does that pick your vision up any?

LRH: Take the last duplicate and smash it.

PC: Hm.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Now let's be very careful that we stand off and take a look at ourselves to see how we're seeing.

LRH: Did it smash easily?

PC: Yes. Yes.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: You got that?

LRH: All right. Smash all the other duplicates and the original together.

PC: Yes.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Now let's stand off on the other side to see how we're seeing now.

LRH: What happened as you did that?

PC: Oh, God!

PC: Well, it seemed like a peace pipe.

LRH: Good. Good. All right. And now let's be on the first side to see how we're seeing. What are you looking at?

LRH: A peace pipe, huh?

PC: It's sort of down this way.

PC: Just before I smashed it.

LRH: Oh? Now let's look at your body to see how you're looking.

LRH: Hm?

PC: Well, I'm seeing how it's looking.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Oh, how it's looking. Good. Now, let's throw "looking poorly" out to see who accepts that.

LRH: Just before you smashed it. What have you got left after your smash?

PC: Well, my mother doesn't seem to mind too much.

PC: Nothing.

LRH: Hm? Your mother what?

LRH: You got that nothing?

PC: Yeah, my mother kind of caught that one as it went out.

PC: That's right.

LRR: Okay. Well, let's throw it out some more to her.

LRH: Well, good! Let's just mock that nothing up as a duplicate.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: "Looking poorly."

LRH: Another duplicate.

Throw out some more "looking poorly."

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: And another duplicate of that.

LRH: Got that?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Uh-huh.

LRH: And a duplicate of that.

LRH: Okay. How's your perception?

PC: Yeah.

PC: I was pausing to see how one perceives. I'm always sort of scared to take a look and see how I'm seeing.

LRH: And a duplicate of that.

LRH: Who is? You scared to take a look.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: And a duplicate of that. Now knock all those duplicates together suddenly.

LRH: ... to see how you're seeing?

PC: Yep.

PC: Yeah, yeah.

LRH: Okay. What did you get when you did that?

LRH: Well, find out that it's much better not to.

PC: Intersection - the lines intersection.

PC: Yes. Yes.

LRH: Have you got a line intersection there now?

LRH: Let's not be curious. Okay. Now can you see how you're seeing? How about reaching and withdrawing from present time now, from where you are.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Good. Let's duplicate the line. Duplicate it again. And again. Again. Again. Again. Now take the two ends of this line and join them both together - the original line.

LRH: You do that easily?

PC: The original, which one's that?

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Oh, you can't tell them apart now. Good. Just take all those lines and join all their ends together.

LRH: Do it rapidly.

PC: Okay.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Got that real good?

LRH: What's the matter?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Well, I think what I'm doing is reaching and withdrawing from present time.

LRH: Got a sort of a big loop or circle or something?

LU!: Good. Good. Good. Does that change your perception any?

PC: Well, I've got a lot of loops.

PC: Not noticeably.

LRH: You've got a lot of them, huh? Come down on them with a big smash.

LRH: Let's really concentrate on how you're perceiving now Now this is serious. This is real serious. Now let's be over on one side of you and take a look at yourself and see how you are seeing. Now let's trace out the optic nerve in the eye. Now let's get the machinery for seeing inside the head. You find some?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: No, I...

LRH: What happens?

LRH: You don't? Well, put some in!

PC: Mm, like a piece of string with a knot in it.

Parabolic mirrors and radar sets; start shoving them into the head.

LRH: Made it real small. Duplicate that.

PC: Yes.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Shove more of them into the head so the head can see. Got it?

LRH: And again.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Put parabolic mirrors behind the body.

LRH: Again.

PC: What are parabolic mirrors?

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Just big mirrors that are curved.

LRH: Again. And again.

PC: All right.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: You got that?

LRH: Again. Now, roll all those duplicates together and then arrange them as a cube of space.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: All right. Now start putting glasses on the face.

LRH: Got that cube of space? Now, put yourself in the middle of it.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: I guess.

LRH: Let's put more glasses on the face.

LRR: Got it?

PC: Yes.

PC: I guess!

LRH: More glasses.

LRII: All right. Yank all those down on you suddenly.

PC: Okay.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: More. More.

LRH: Do you like that? What do you have left as you do that?

PC: They're here now.

PC: Nothing. LRH: Hm?

LRH: Okay. Now put those aside carefully and save them and put more glasses on.

PC: Nothing.

PC: Yes.

LILH: They all disappeared again?

LRH: More glasses.

PC: Well, l made them into a cube of space - I kind of disappeared them. You see how that - I'm - what I mean, I just made a chunk of space out of them.

PC: Yes.

LRH: Oh, I see. Well, why don't you get them back again and put them around as eight...

LRH: More glasses.

PC: All right.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: ...anchor points.

LRH: More glasses.

PC: Oh, all right.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: How did you have this cube of space, by the way?

LRH: Now give one pair back to your parents.

PC: Just a little cube of space.

PC: Yes.

LRH: Yeah.

LRH: All right. Put more glasses on.

PC: ... about an inch in diameter.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: A little cube of space?

LRH: Now, finally, after you've put on twelve more pairs.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Which direction is it from you right now?

LRH: ... put on twelve more pairs.

PC: Well, I tried to have it where I was.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Okay. Let's put these eight anchor points - these eight cubes - get eight cubes just exactly like you made before - and put those around you.

LRH: Get your parents being satisfied now. Get them both smiling happily.

88 PC: All right.

PC: Not my old man.

LRH: You got those? Yank those in on yourself suddenly.

LRH: Can't you get him smiling happily?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Not at glasses, no.

LRH: Come in easily?

LRH: Not at glasses?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: No.

LRH: No resistance to them at all?

LRH: What would he smile happily about?

PC: No,. there wasn't at all.

PC: Probably my winning the Olympics or something.

LRH: Hm? Good. Good. What do you got left?

LRH: Oh. Well, just present him with your case of medals on having won the Olympics. That's easy.

PC: I've got this string waiting around here.

PC: Yes.

LRH: All right. Duplicate the string.

LRH: You got those?

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Duplicate it again.

LRH: Did that make him smile happily?

PC: Yeah.

PC: Yeah!

LRH: And again.

LU!: Good. You finally made him happy. All right.

PC: Yeah.

Okay. Now let's be well up and take another glance around.

LRH: And again.

Now get a finger snap in front of you and then hear it.

PC: Yeah.

PC: You mean do it?

LRH: And again.

LRH: No. Right where you are - mock one up and then hear it.

PC: Mm.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: And again.

LRH: Fairly easy?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Give it a yank so it gets longer.

LRH: Well, make the sound of gum popping and hear that.

PC: Okay.

PC: Yes.

LRH: Did it get longer?

LRH: You got that?

PC: Yeah.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: You didn't believe it did.

LRH: More gum popping.

PC: Well, I believe it as well as I believe any of the rest of this stuff.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Yeah?

LRH: Now a cat spitting.

PC: Sure.

PC: It's a little harder.

LRH: Oh, you mean this stuff's giving you a little trouble, huh?

LRH: Really?

PC: Well, I don't see any of it.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: You don't see any of it.

LRH: Oh? Well, now get the sound of the last ...

PC: I get an idea.

PC: Oh, I just got it.

LRH: Oh, you get an idea. Duplicate that idea of it.

LU!: Well, good.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Duplicate it again.

LRH: You know why, too. Get the sound of the last drop of soda.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Yes.

LRH: Duplicate it again.

LRH: Nearly everybody in the class got that.

PC: Mm-hm.

Okay, now get a backfire of a truck.

LRH: Duplicate it again.

PC: Yeah, truck noise. I've never heard one backfire, knowing it was a truck.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: You never heard one backfire?

LRH: Duplicate it again.

PC: Uh-uh.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Well, get any kind of a backfire. What do you mean you never heard one? Ohhhh! This is what we're trying to do, huh? Well, make a truck backfire "Yankee Doodle." Come on, get it backfiring... You can get that, can't you?

LRH: All right. Now smash all these duplicates together.

PC: Yes.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Well now, let's get you, as a punishment, having to agree with the MEST universe.

LRH: What happened?

Now more, as a punishment, having to tell the truth all the time. Get you telling the truth.

PC: Oh, got a little mass, seems like, to it.

PC: Yes.

LRH: You got a little mass there?

LRH: ... for years and years...

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Yes.

LRH: Well, duplicate it.

LRH: ... and years, and telling only what really happened.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Yes.

LURH And again.

LU!: Years and years...

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Yes.

LRH: And again.

LRH: ... telling what's really happened. Now, is that sufficient overt act?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Overt act! That's a motivator!

LRH: And again. Now, we get you playing "Ring-Around-the-Rosy," around it.

LRH: Against you.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Oh! No.

LRH: Can you do that? Doesn't seem to interest you.

LRH: It isn't, huh? Not having to tell the truth? You really should tell the truth.

PC: Well, I don't know...

PC: Yes.

LRH: You got it real good there?

LRH: [to audience] All right, just as an aside which the preclear is not supposed to hear, there went perception. You get how we caught that? And that one you always want to look for. She says "I never - I don't think I've ever heard a truck backfire that I knew it was a truck." See that? She's putting facsimiles up there and trying to listen to facsimiles - she thinks.

PC: Yeah, I got it stacked like a stack of soda crackers.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: You have, huh?

LRH: All right. Now let's put some facsimiles up there with the most beautiful sonic in it that everyone ever listened to and throw them into a fire without listening.

PC: Yeah.

PC: That's all right, I've never heard sonic in my life anyway.

LRH: All right. Now grab it suddenly and keep it from exploding. What happened?

LRH: Well, let's waste it.

PC: Well, I just got an idea of "hanging on for dear life." If it was about to explode, I don't see why I was hanging on.

PC: Okay.

LRH: Now, what have you got there?

LRH: Now let's waste a voice by not speaking.

PC: Well...

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: This string developed any?

LRH: Let's get your parents wasting voices by not speaking.

PC: Well, it's not a string anymore.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: What is it?

LRH: Let's get you wasting voices by not telling something to turn into MEST.

PC: Well, let's see. First it was some ideas and then I smashed those down; it got like a little wafer and then I made a bunch of duplicates like a stack of crackers. : LRH: Now what is it?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: The same.

LRH: Let's get you wasting voices by practicing telepathy.

LRH: Just a stack of duplicates?

PC: Mm.

PC: That's right.

LRH: And now let's get a silent voice and throw it out in front of you a few times.

LRH: Well, grab it quick again and keep it from exploding.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Who's acceptable to it?

LRH: Make a quick lunge at it again.

PC: Dad.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Good. Let's feed him some more silent voices.

LRR: Another quick lunge at it.

PC: Yes.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Feed it to him until he's happy.

LRH: Another one.

PC: He's not getting happy, he's getting annoyed at this point.

PC: It's only about this thick now.

LRH: Oh, he is. Well, at least bring him up Tone Scale till he's real happy.

LRH: Make another lunge at it.

PC: Not with silent voices. At this point he wants to hear again.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: All right. Let's get quiet voices.

LRH: Is it disappearing? Huh?

PC: Yeah.

PC: It's just about gone.

LRH: And let's get deafness on his part. Throw deafness out in his direction.

LRH: Just about gone, that's too bad.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: More deafness.

LRH: Well, blow it up.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Okay.

LRH: Now get deafness being thrown to you from him.

LRH: Did it blow up nicely?

PC: Mm. I can throw; it doesn't seem to come very naturally.

PC: It's gone.

LRH: It doesn't, huh?

LRH: It's gone. Okay. This gives you no - does this give you any idea there might be a communication line around there anyplace? PC: No, it didn't.

PC: No.

LRH: It didn't, huh?

LRH: Get no voice being thrown to you. Get silence being thrown to you, large quantities of silence.

PC: To me - to me there isn't any.

PC: Mm-hm

LRH: Okay.

LRH: More silence. Get silence on interesting subjects being thrown to you.

PC: But...

PC: Yeah!

LRH: All I was trying to do was develop a line...

LRH: Yeah, more silence on interesting subjects being thrown to you.

PC: What it does do...

PC: Yeah.

LRH: ... to tell you what I was doing. Trying to develop a line so we could find nothing at the end of it. What was it doing?

LRH: [to audience] We obviously hit that acceptance level.

PC: Well, what it does do is it - I kind of get an idea of more substance to these things than there is to my mock-ups.

More silence on interesting subjects.

LRH: Oh. That's real interesting. Good.

PC: Yeah.

PC: There's not much substance.

LRH: By the way, were you ever Puck on the time track?

LRH: No, nobody's finding you with any substance.

All right. Now let's get a finger snap and listen to it.

PC: There's more.

PC: Yeah.

All right. This one carried on and on and on and on and on and on, far longer than I'm willing to carry it on, will - at this time - will eventually develop with the preclear a piece of communication line. Now, he starts developing and stops developing, and so forth, and he'll eventually get an expanded line of some sort or another. He'll be at the other end of it - the first thing that he associates with him. But he won't associate himself with it. He'll be "no responsibility." And this is the case of "all lines" and so forth. And when we're searching for a total responsibility, we're searching, at the end of every line, an identification with the terminal.

LRH:: A truck backfiring "Yankee Doodle."

Now, you see the analogy between nothing at the end of a communication line and a person not getting out of his body. Do you see an analogy there? Well, do you see an analogy with no communication lines of any kind, and a possible development of a communication line? It's the same, same gradient scale, see? Nothing and then - a nothingness of communication lines and then the semblances and so forth of communication lines and then gradually, little by little, more and more of the preclear.

PC: Yes.

PC: You get wisps. The first time that I imploded just a nothing behind my head, well, it just seemed like wisps of smoke back there.

LRH: Got that?

LRH: Okay. This is just no effort, really, to get somebody to look, but this is giving him as much at a time as he will look at, that's all.

PC: Yeah.

PC: That's right.

LRH: Okay. Now get "O Sole Mio" being played on a violin.

So you just might as well settle down for a long haul on that kind of processing. Perfectly good processing, by the way. And if a case is - doesn't exteriorize, sometimes you run that processing for a very short time and the guy will suddenly exteriorize. That's all there is to that.

PC: Oh, God!

Now, let's add this up about acceptance level and havingness. Now, we know that anything a person has been thoroughly denied becomes scarce with him or nonexistent. Well, that's somebody else putting up a screen for him to protect him from something. And the screen will have in it something on the order of "no soda crackers." (He's mentioned soda crackers, all right.) He's got - obviously had no soda crackers and then he could have a soda cracker. All right. So we're just busting through screens, screens, screens, screens, screens and it develops on to Acceptance Level Processing.

LRH: That's an overt act against you by society.

Once in a while somebody will say, "Licorice. What am I expected to do with all this licorice?" or "What am I expected to do with this or that?" He's just come into the possession of licorice. And if he were to think about it for a moment, he'd feel kind of pleased (if you called it to his attention). You don't have to call it to his attention though, it just passes away.

PC: Oh, I get it.

Now, here's your acceptance level building up. What I'm trying to show you is it's the bottom rung of automaticity. This is automaticity in operation. It's automatic automaticity, if you want to call it that. Well, the process which simply unveils automaticity, minute after minute and yard after yard, and so forth, will eventually wind up with less automatic operation of the body and more self-determined preclear. That's obvious, isn't it?

LRH: Played by Jack Benny. Now throw out classical music and operatic music in front of you.

Well now, let's just take the horns by the bull and stab the preclear straight to the heart. What can't he have? He builds up a screen against soda crackers. You throw a soda cracker in front of him; you find soda crackers on the E-Meter - pang - charge on soda crackers. All right, you just have him mock up soda crackers, soda crackers, soda crackers, soda crackers. All of a sudden they seem to be going into some section of blackness - pong, pong, pong. And the next thing you know, an old force screen or something will appear which was set up there to resist soda crackers. Of course, soda crackers is not something that people just put up force screens to resist usually, but it's much worse that they are resisting.

PC: Yes.

For instance, sex. People are walking around all the time, they wonder why they have a sexual anesthesia - some of these cases that do have one - they don't get any fun out of sex anymore. Well, if you just start having them mock up everything connected with sex, in shape and form and size, they'll all of a sudden find these mock-ups - well, they - the mock-ups at first won't exist - no existence, no existence, no existence, none, none, none, none.

LRH: Who accepts it?

You say, "Well, just keep putting them there. Keep putting them there. Put some more there. Put some more there. More. More." All of a sudden they say, "Well, now it's getting - it's very funny, it stays there for a moment."

PC: Hm. Well, I've got Dad accepting some.

Now, if you keep this up, in a moment or two - I mean, in a few minutes you ask them, "All right. Now what are the mock-ups doing?" They say, "Well, you know, there just seems to be a vacuum cleaner sitting around here someplace."

LRH: Good. Let's give it to him until he's real fed up with it.

You get that? It sets up a force screen. That which a person resists he eventually gets a starvation for. This is a starvation screen. You want to know what I mean by hunger? He resists something, that makes it scarce, and then he'll get hungry for it.

PC: Yes.

This is a heck of a note. This is why electric shock is so effective on insane people. You hit them with a hard shock, you see, and they set up a resistance of being shocked while they're dragged in there, you see? And then the shock hits them and then they get a hunger for electric shocks. And you know, they'll come back for their electric shocks just as regular as clockwork. They can let them go anyplace and say, "You be back Thesday for your electric shock," and they report right back for their electric shocks, see? Because the screens that they're setting up every time are so quick - they sell themselves they can't have a shock and it creates an instantaneous hunger for a shock. You get the force involved with it. The force is so great.

LRH: Okay. Now get the sound of a buttercup growing.

The worst thing in the world you could do for anybody in that condition is to give him a heavy jolt of MEST - easily the worst thing, see? You just have to turn every reason that anybody ever thought of inside out to figure out an electric shock. But the patient gets a hunger for electric shock machines. And that's all there are to it.

PC: Mm, yeah.

He doesn't want them, the force screen is caved in on him, and the caving is so violent that it creates a vacuum, and the vacuum is created - an electronic vacuum - and this is created by an electric shock so that the only thing that fills the vacuum is electric shock.

LRH: Get it exploding.

Now, what's that got to do with electronics? Every once in a while you get a preclear who has - seems to get an absolute thirst for electronics. They're - every time you turn around, they're in a new electronic.

PC: Mm-hm.

"Oh, boy!" you say, "For God's sakes!" so on. Well, the way to do it is just have them rig up electronics that same way. "Mock up an electronic. Mock up an electronic. Mock up another electronic facsimile. Now mock up big machines, and all this sort of thing," - electronics, see? And you'll see them going into the bank, slurp, slurp, slurp. And the next thing you know there'll be heavy jolts and that sort of thing, and the fellow has fulfilled some of his acceptance level of living. It isn't just a - his acceptance level: What's his acceptance level? Shocks.

LRH: Now get the sound of glass breaking.

Now, this business of having to waste things before he can have them is an assurance that they exist. See, it's an indirect method of observing them, that's all. And it answers up on the subject of waste. Well, there's a lot deeper reason and significance to it than that. The best significance to it is that it works.

PC: Yeah.

Now, let's take, then, what this preclear really can't have. He compulsively comes back and grabs bodies, but he can't have one, they don't exist. He has physical anesthesia. He can't have a body.

LRH: Is that pretty good?

Now, in Acceptance Level Processing, unlike Expanded GITA - Expanded GITA is a bit different. You waste things before you can have them. But Acceptance Level Processing is just an effort to determine what grade of the object - when you're hitting at a real object, see, real direct - you vary the grade, that is you vary the quality of the object until he can accept it, rather than waste it first, you see? You vary the quality of the object. Now, that is the significant difference. It's done in brackets of five just like everything else is.

PC: I love glass breaking.

But what is the quality of the object? Now, if you can find the quality of the object that he will accept - like an egg. The person can't have an egg. You've found out that he has an allergy to eggs. All right. You'll find out that he can accept some kind of egg. You know he's going to be able to accept some kind of egg. But you just start downstairs on eggs. Of course you go immediately into rotten eggs, and maybe he can accept rotten eggs. That's good. And you just let him accept rotten eggs till he can accept good eggs. Simple.

LRH: Good.

But usually if there's an allergy to it, it's a little worse than that. So it'd be a rotten egg where the chicken was about to be hatched and died and is now lying in there all decayed. And he can't quite accept this but if you put mold over the outside of the - you see, you're caving in a lot of screens at once - if you put mold over the eggshell and then if you were to paint it with some unmentionable subject, and so forth, he's going to be able to accept some portion of this.

PC: The sound of it, yeah.

Of course, you can be fully prepared, after he's all through, to get the dead chicken, whatever the unmentionable stuff was the egg was painted with, and the mold - they're all gone - and there sits, very purely, an eggshell. He can't accept it. I mean, here we go. I mean, you could be prepared for that sort of thing to happen.

LRH: Good. Real tinkly.

But what the preclear can't have, of course, on an inverted dynamic... If he's in a body, you're just trying to exteriorize him; and when we get this specialized, why, what he can't have, of course, is a body. This is terribly elementary. He's in a body and you're asking him to get out of the body and he can't get out of a body because he hasn't got a body.

PC: Mm.

That's what no responsibility is. He is on the basis of "I am not and I do not have a body and I am sitting in nothing, but I am alive and going through life."

LRH: Mm-hm. How's your sonic coming? Now, mock up a facsim- what? Horrible?

How does he account for this? Well, he goes through and accounts for it on the basis that he is a stimulus-response mechanism which is being guided by the social world around him and he is under the influence and effect of the world around him, and this accounts for every and any impulse of thinkingness or anything else that he has.

PC: No. No.

What is the level of psychology and psychologists on the subject of bodies? Right there. They don't exist and they can't have one and there are no communication lines, therefore, from themselves to the body; and the body is thereby and therefore solely monitored on stimulus-response mechanisms coming in from the environment. And in addition to that, it's all monitored by some mysterious entity known as God, or something, who started it all out. And you have adjustment to the environment by psychology. This is about as degraded as you could get, but they've managed it.

LRH: Is it faint or is it getting better?

Now, their acceptance level is fantastic. They're even "can't survive" on a body they can't have. They have to go out, in psychoanalysis, into the second dynamic, which is the future. They not only can't have a body, but the body they can't have can't survive as itself so they have to concentrate on the second dynamic. But everybody knows the second dynamic is no good because that's all anesthesed too, so we have to go off into cravings which stem from an extended second dynamic - which doesn't exist - and, of course, the cravings are forbidden by the society, so you get a dead end. So that is how they say apathy is produced.

PC: I got a good, strong impression.

This is how - how far can you get from not having? But that's all you're leaving is - you're leaving from the point of being able to have, and then as the person goes down the line on deterioration, why, you get this sort of thing. They go down the line on the dynamics: one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight. They can't have a body but they can have God. Now, that's all the way out the line. But intervening, they can't have themselves, they can't have a communication line in themselves because they don't exist. Now we get to the first dynamic as represented by a body. Now we're already inverted, so we can't have a body, and this body we can't have, can't survive either - it's very frail and not dangerous to the environment - so we have to go into the second dynamic. And we find out that there is - one can't have babies, that's just unthinkable - have babies. So we've barred on can't - on a "can't survive" there, as a "can't survive" on babies, so we have to go into sex itself and account for it as a sensation. And then, of course, there isn't any sensation in it unless it itself is a bit twist- . But there's no sensation that way because the society bars that out. So we have to look for it in a group.

LRH: Is it getting better?

Now, we get a basis of we can't survive in a group because politics and so forth are all balderdash, and we can't get anywhere like that, so we can't survive in groups, so we can't have a group.

PC: Mm-hm.

So we look over here and we find we can't have man. The reason we can't have man is man is stupid and he's here for a very short time and he can't survive and he is prone to be destroyed in a very short time anyway by atomic warfare, so we can't have man.

LRH: All right. Mock up a beautiful facsimile, just gorgeous, with the most beautiful sonic in it anyone ever could have heard. Got one?

Now, that's all very interesting, but if - see what we can have here. Let's get the level of acceptance. We go out from can't have man - fourth dynamic - to animals. And of course, it was very cute to have puppies and cats and that sort of thing when one was a very, very little child, but, of course, "one isn't a child anymore, and they're too much trouble, and one always loses one's pets anyway," so he can't have any pets, so that's a can't survive on the fifth dynamic.

PC: Yes.

Now, the MEST universe is all very well but it's all illusion. Well, one doesn't want an illusion, so he can't have an illusion. And when he was very young, why, Christ was all right, he was very friendly, as a matter of fact, and so on. But that's mostly - people, you know, they have to believe in that sort of thing. And they did once, but it requires nothing but faith and, of course, they can't have any faith anymore and they did have hopes on that once in a while, but actually religion doesn't lead anybody anyplace in the final analysis because you never get your wish anyway so, of course, one can't survive on the basis of spirits and religion, and so forth.

LRH: Have it be completely silent as an overt act against you by facsimiles.

So that leaves just, of course, God. "And, of course, God naturally exists because there is all this space around here and this space is obviously surviving so, of course, it's obviously surviving. Of course, the space itself is liable to collapse. But the prime mover unmoved is not liable to collapse because he created all this, and maybe he can't either." And nobody yet has come up with as flat a "can't survive" as "God will never again be able to create another MEST universe." But if we mentioned it, brother, it'd be out in the streets.

PC: Yeah.

"It is highly unlikely that God, having created this universe, will be able to create another one. After all, look at the lesson he's learned from looking at man down through the ages." If you were to start beating the pulpit on that you would really see some apathy, because when they go all the way out on the inverted dynamics, they get out to that one, and God, he survives.

LRH: Get a whole bunch of facsimiles standing around refusing to give.

And you go down to the sanitarium, the boys who are completely inverted on all eight, so on, they can turn to just one, one location. You can't even take Christ in a sanitarium. There's nobody going to do anything about Christ, particularly. If you find anybody there "he is Christ," he's already completely inverted on it, see?

PC: Crack! Yes.

Okay. What's this a problem of then? It's a problem of havingness on the inverted dynamics. If you just wanted to turn all these things around and run Acceptance Level in brackets on any preclear who simply couldn't get out of his head, you're going to be able to turn all these things around and just wind up back up the track again.

LRH: Now get the idea you deserve it.

Fortunately, the people with whom you have to deal and the techniques with which you are dealing - present moment - are sufficiently strong so that you could start in, in full stride. You don't have to go through too much of this. But let me assure you that that I have just given you as the reductio ad absurdum of the case - remember it, because it's the inverted dynamics, in brackets, on Acceptance Level Processing.

PC: Yes.

Some day, in dumb desperation or other, you may all of a sudden find somebody who doesn't respond anyplace but the seventh or eighth so completely that it's only the seventh or eighth in a completely debased form that he can accept. Now, remember that. You'll even have to get the seventh and eighth.

LRH: Okay, throw them all on the fire.

You're trying to get this fellow to have a body so he can get out of it. This is the same thing I've been talking to you about for days. It's just another method of attack on the same problem.

PC: Mm.

All right. Acceptance level. Pc dropped in - processed some little time ago, the other day - and I ran her for about ten, fifteen minutes. This auditor had run Expanded GITA on her, just ad nauseam, and it had turned on considerable nausea. She was in bad shape. So on the basis of the fact that the "hair of the dog that bit him" is the best cure, why, I fed her some more Expanded GITA and snapped her out of it. Odd part of it was that her eyes, and so forth, had hung into the color and she'd stayed stable through this. She was just sick physically. So I hit it right where it was and got her to accept healthy bodies. It was an immediate result. This case exteriorizes, by the way.

LRH: ... without hearing them.

"All right. Healthy body. Get another healthy body, put it in the chair there. Another healthy body. Another one. Another one. Another one. Another one." This case is getting sick by this time, see? "Another healthy body." Oh, boy. Oh, boy. Getting real sick. Getting much sicker. And suddenly the gastric juices were in contest with one another and she was getting into a rather desperate look on her face as she picked up gaily another healthy body and another healthy body, and she was putting them on, you see, sitting there in the chair, one after the other. And this was getting horrible. She was getting into terrible condition, you see?

PC: No, no.

So, naturally, I was just trying to build this thing up to jar into her what her goal was. And then I gave her an old, moldy, decayed, dead body that had died of psoriasis. And boy, she put that on and that was much better. And she put on more and more and more of these and gradually she was up to a point where she was taking bodies that were merely dead. And then she was merely taking old bodies that were about to die. And all this with great rapidity, you understand. I mean, there wasn't any slowness about this, she was getting - communication line picking up - she was feeling better and better and better and better. In other words, by forcing her - pardon me - by giving her healthy bodies she was being forced at the wrong level of the scale. And by feeding her a gradient scale of bodies she could accept, she recovered from this illness. That's something for you to remember.

LRH: All right. Now, this time get the sound of a flag whipping in the breeze.

To give her something she could accept - it was right on the button was a certainty. What was it a certainty of? You see why it was the wrong end of the scale? She knew she couldn't accept, but she was being forced to accept a healthy body, so therefore, the mock-up, everything else, was insecure, uncertain. But to give her a body that was at her level of acceptance - this was great certainty. And so we merely had her certainly accepting bodies, which was what our goal was. Our goal was not to feed her decayed bodies, our goal was merely to get her to accept something she could accept and knew she could accept it, and therefore, on a gradient scale of certainty, bring her right back on up to the point where she could accept a healthy body.

PC: Mm-hm.

A little bit of this processing is fantastic. This woman was ill and she left not ill on this process which I tell auditors, "Don't use this broadly on cases," mainly because it's not necessary to, but mostly because they just don't have the instruction, the indoctrination on the thing.

LRH: Impression better?

There comes a time, and there are some cases, where you run Acceptance Level Processing - they're bad enough off on acceptance - where they run Acceptance Level Processing and Expanded GITA simultaneously. Now, how do you do this?

PC: Yeah.

You find the worst body you can possibly think of; in the worst condition, in the worst location, and they still can't accept it. Well now, you can run all the way on out the dynamics and run it by the dynamics or you can simply start in and shortcut it by running "wasting the last body you thought of." And if you had exhausted it down that far, they will probably be able to waste, in brackets, that body.

LRH: Now, here we go - there's no reason to turn this on. Some other auditors could have a good crack at this.

Such cases, fortunately, are not particularly numerous. They're - it's kind of rare. But the point is that any time you run Acceptance Level Processing and you just can't get bad enough on this case to get him to accept some kind of an item which he has to be able to accept - the only one you're really interested in is a body, right at this stage - is you run it all the way down scale as far as the condition of the item is concerned and then waste it. And that last one - wasting it in a bracket and then bringing it back up and accepting it - very, very well may turn the trick.

[to audience] You get the idea of the interplays, acceptances and acceptance levels, and so forth.

But the quickest shot in is Acceptance Level Processing. The longer process is Expanded GITA. You follow this? See, in other words, to do a fast job we do Acceptance Level Processing. And we just take a good shot at what this person has, and we guess - we guess this will do it, and we give them that, and then we run it down scale a little bit and generally they can accept it right along. But if they don't accept it with a little feeling of relief, if you don't really get that relief reaction from them as they accept it, you haven't gotten far enough down scale for - they're just being obedient. It takes your judgment as an auditor to know whether or not they're accepting this thing with certainty. That's the judgment.

And you noticed the first moment that we got into a dangerous sound, such as a cat spitting, that might have been accompanied in childhood, and so forth, that we got an immediate balk on it. And then we got into agreement with the past: "must be truthful."

What kind of a body will somebody accept who doesn't get out of his body easily? Well, that's for you to find out as an auditor. And you run it on Acceptance Level Processing.

Now, this truthfulness is all right except all it - all people mean by truthfulness is you must say - "anything you say happened must have happened before you can say that it happened," which is an enforcement of the time lag. This is completely irrational, by the way. It's not even reasonable. It slows down more communication channels; jams more communication channels.

All right. Let's take a pc that is in pretty good shape rather than someone who's in bad shape - there aren't any here really in bad shape.

If people have to have reasons, you should always give them - according to life itself - something which snaps in and makes the whole thing believable. Don't give them a reason which is an agreement with the past because they won't believe it.

LRH: All right. Now, let's put on a beautiful girl. Mock up a beautiful girl and put it on.

If you ever want to get into a complete challenge situation, just be very careful to enumerate exactly what happened. It's never reasonable because life isn't reasonable in that way. It doesn't go like a continued story or a plot.

PC: Mm-hm.

But America is quite fictionized and it's - keep insisting - it keeps insisting that everything that has happened in the past is - if accounted for as itself - is quite reasonable.

LRH: Another beautiful girl and put it on.

There's quite a big difference between that and lying. Lying to effect an injury is socially objectionable - lying on an entheta level, see? That's an entirely different thing than quoting the past. But people have these two things identified. See, they've got recounting exactly what happened identified with lying in order to create entheta. You know, perverting facts in order to create bad feeling. Perverting facts in order to cut affinity lines. We were talking about affinity this morning. All right, that's what lines were. Well, that's what they object to.

PC: Mm-hm.

But if you come in and you say, "Well, I was - drove in and this and that happened, and so forth, and as I came into town, why, this and that occurred and it occurred just exactly in this fashion," you not only don't have any audience but it probably isn't reasonable, because people's reason does not fit very well with the past. They can't even look at the past, so they take some reason out of a storybook or something as the acceptable reason.

LRH: Another beautiful girl and put it on.

"Well, the reason they parted," see, "was because..." and so on. And then you go ahead and give the exact reason as to why they parted. Really, you recount the blow-by-blow description of exactly who parted from whom and why, and that sort of thing. It leaves people wondering what the significance is. But if you - but if you simply say, "Well, they parted because, after all, it got to an intolerable situation. She had this mania for eating peanuts in bed and he finally got shell shocked. And so they had to separate and that's all there is to it." Why, people just dismiss the subject from there on; there's no more significance to it, you see. It's a fast way of getting rid of significance.

PC: Mm-hm. Each different or the same?

If you want to clear a time track, why, you'll find that's very acceptable conversational level if somebody's terribly serious and they're getting more and more serious about this horrible parting that took place. That - that's dead; that's past.

LRH: I don't care.

Because it's a big trick, see, it's a big trick. "You must recount exactly what took place," makes a person, eventually, unable to change his past. He can't suddenly say, "You know I was a - I was a drummer boy up till 1920 and then I went straight." Well, this is neither reasonable nor anything else, but if the preclear can say this with entire conviction, simply put that on his track, and so forth, it gets around the fact that his papa beat him incessantly and consistently up to the time when he was ten. And as a matter of fact, a lot of fellows do this.

PC: Okay.

But the point is that an agreement with the past makes one have to recall from the past only. And that's senseless. It's just much easier to recall something you just put on the time track because you just thought of it. See how simple that is to recall things? And far from insanity, this is close to sanity, an instantaneously created universe at any given instant.

LRH: Oh, each was different.

Now, this is nothing that you would advise children to perform because you'd simply never find anything out about what happened and the children would be happy, and so forth.

PC: No, they tend to be the same.

You see, it's terribly important exactly what streets the child walked home on. The only thing that's objected to in a child lying - the child comes in and says, "No, Mama," we get into havingness again, "No, Mama, I have not seen that ten-dollar bill." Chomp! chomp! chomp! on the candy. See, and the kid measured it wrong; he got havingness mixed up with the past. You can't have any past anyhow, the truth of the matter is, without getting stuck with it. That's not the kind of havingness you want.

LRH: Yeah. Well, do you find it very easy to accept this?

Now, you're trying to bail somebody out of the past. You can just run Reach and Withdraw on the past and get someplace.

PC: Mm-hm.

Now, far from continuing this thing out ad infinitum, there's an example of Acceptance Level Processing.

LRH: Very easy?

But let's take a look here at John.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Now, let's accept a body, John.

LRH: Good! See. All right. Another beautiful girl.

PC: Mm.

PC; Mm-hm.

LRH: What kind of a body is it?

LRH: A really gorgeous girl, now.

PC: A gentleman. Not a gentleman, but a man.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: A man. A gentlemanly body?

LRH: Oh, fabuious, with lots of training and manners and oh, stuff, you know? You know? Now one with terrific choreography ability.

PC: No, not necessarily.

PC: All right.

LRH: Well dressed?

LRH: One with a beautiful singing voice.

PC: No.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: No? How about - is he dead?

LRH: One who is rich.

PC: No, he's alive.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Alive, warm?

LRH: You notice all those talents? Put on this beautiful babe.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Yes.

LRH: Real warm?

LRH: Is that better?

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Animated?

LRH.~ Put on this real good looking babe. Huh?

PC: Yeah.

PC: Yes.

LRH: Agile?

LRH: A nice-a nice babe, now.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Good looking?

LRH: A very polite girl.

PC: He's fair.

PC: No.

LRH: Real good looking or just fair - passing fair?

LRH: See? I was just doing that for - just to razzle-dazzle on the PC. There's an example of what acceptance is.

PC: Passing fair.

All right. Now get this completely uninhibited, utterly defensible woman.

LRH: Girls like him?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: I didn't ask him.

LRH: Now get one who is very beautiful on top of all this.

LRH: All right. Would you accept this body as yours?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Oh, yeah.

LRH: Now get one who is very vicious.

LU!: All right, let's put it on.

PC: Mm.

PC: I did.

LRH: A very beautiful, vicious woman.

LRH: Now let's take another one, more gentlemanly.

PC: Mm.

PC: It's not ungentlemanly. I didn't mean that. I just meant a male body.

LRH: A very beautiful girl who could get exactly what she wants.

LRH: Oh, well, all right. Let's take this plain, old, common, ordinary, run-of-the-mill male...

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: That's right.

LRH: We hit it. How do you know we hit it?

LRH: .. body and put it on.

All right. Let's take this beautiful girl who can get exactly what she wants, again.

PC: Right.

PC: Yep.

LRH: Another common, old, ordinary, run-of-the-mill body and put it on. Another one. Kind of used-up body.

LRH: Again.

PC: No.

PC: Mm-mm.

LRH: No? All right. Run-of-the-mill, put it on. Get this guy now and put him on, that's awful average.

LRH: Again.

You don't like him?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Well, I wouldn't say that but I'll put him on.

LRH: Again.

LRH: Well, you'll put him on. And get this guy above average, now.

PC: Yes.

PC: That's right.

LRH: Let's mock up a lot of boxes of her; boxes full of her

LRH: And get the guy and put him on, that's real intelligent.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Body?

LIW: All right. Now keep taking them out of the box and putting them on.

LRH: Uh-huh, a body.

PC: Mm.

PC: Okay

LRH: What's the matter?

LRH: "The body," that's real good. Come on, let's put on another one of him.

PC: By the dozens.

PC: Okay

LRH: Dozens.

LRH: And let's put on another fellow that's very acceptable.

PC: Mm.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Good. Let's rig in some more boxes, have a whole bunch of freight trucks pull up outside and get people carrying those boxes of them upstairs - putting them on with fair rapidity. Let's have a warehouse of them down on the Delaware River, all of them beautifully animate. And get them, now, that are perfectly controlled by you.

LU!: Another one.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: That better?

LRH: Another one.

PC: Mm.hm. Mm.hm.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Get them now that can perfectly control others, too, but not you.

LRH: Another one.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Don't like that so well?

LRH: And let's kind of pat them all in now that you've got them all there.

PC: Mm, too tiresome.

PC: Okay.

LRH: Tiresome. Well, now get them that just love to be crushed.

LRH: Now, all right. Let's get another one.

PC: Mm.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: That better? Whose emotions and impulses go out of control very easily.

LRH: Another one.

PC: Mm.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Have to be watched very carefully. Hit it. Now let's get those, lots of them. Now get them with very beautiful eyes, particularly lovely eyes. All-seeing eyes, now, that can look straight through people, but are very beautiful.

LRH: Now let's mock up in the future a lot of bodies to use in case this one wears out.

PC: Mm. No.

Now hide them so nobody else can find them.

LRH: Eyes that people are afraid of.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Hide - you got that?

LRH: Eyes that pull people in.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Now, let's mock up a lot of babies that'll grow into acceptable bodies.

LRH: Eyes that are very daring.

PC: Will they?

PC: Mm.

LRH: Oh, a big question on it. Well, let's mock up enough so some of them will.

LRH: Just simply beautiful eyes. All right. Get a girl now who has eyes and really can use them.

PC: Oh, I see, I see, yeah.

PC: Mm.

LRH: You got that?

LRH: And has no inhibition whatsoever about doing so.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Okay. Now let's hide them.

LRH: What have we hit? Go on. Another beautiful girl.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Okay. Now let's mock up a lot more babies that will grow into acceptable bodies - on some small percentage, of course.

LRH: Another one.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: And let's mock up enough parents and nursemaids to take care of them.

LRH: Another one. Another one. A very relaxed, feline girl now; very nice, beautifully dressed.

PC: What do you want with all these people?

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Well, you're hiding them, I'm not.

LRH: Daringly dressed.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: All right. Hide those now.

LRH: Nakedly dressed.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Okay. You got them?

LRH: More of them.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: All right. Now, just as a little experiment, how about being up... You like to get above your body or back of your body, now?

LRH: Get lots of them.

PC: It's immaterial to me.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Well, be wherever you like, but exteriorized. You make it? Hm?

LRH: One that can't be embarrassed.

PC: No.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Okay. Let's put on a skeleton.

LRH: More of them. More of them. Why don't you just cram all these down in a space where you are.

PC: All right.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: You got that?

LRH: Cram them down real good.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Put on another skeleton.

LRH: Real tight. Okay. Now get a flock of them for the future. Enormous number of them for the future.

PC: Okay.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Now let's have somebody else accept a skeleton.

LRH: Now get babies that will grow into them in the future.

PC: Well, nobody wants one.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Nobody wants one? Well, then you accept a lot of them.

LRH: Enormous numbers of these.

PC: Okay

PC: Yeah.

LRH: You can accept lots of them?

LRH: Get those all racked up properly so they're available at any moment.

PC: I reckon.

PC: They're almost so available they might begin to get boring sometime.

LRH: All right, let's get a lot of those skeletons.

LRH: They're so terrifically available?

PC: I already got a lot.

PC: They're beginning to get a little bit that way.

LRH: Well, get a lot more. All right. Put all those on. Did you do that easily?

LRH: Is that right?

PC: Yeah, they're coming from all directions and Pm putting them on.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Good. Good. Let's have them kind of moldy as they're coming in there now.

LRH: Well, let's get...

PC: I can give it to you better than this if that's all right.

PC: Not quite.

LRH: Go ahead, give it to me better than that. What is it?

LRH: ... about twice as many.

PC: Well, they - I can always get what collects in the bottom of a communal grave after about two months, you know.

PC: All right.

LRH: Okay, have that hanging on to them. Got that hanging on to them?

LRH: Now let's have them perfectly preserved. Now let's have an entire - a tremendous system of completely reliable preservation for these bodies, so there's just no slightest chance that you would ever miss getting one of them anytime you wanted one.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Mm. Yeah.

LRH: That's real good.

LRH: Got it?

PC: No.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Get somebody else accepting it. Just throw it out in front until somebody accepts it.

LRH: Real good system. Now just hide that whole setup so it's only you know where it is.

PC: The garbage man, I guess.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: All right. Give it to the garbage man.

LRH: All right. Now let's mock up a bunch of babies that will grow into such beautiful women in the future.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Okay, let's put on a few more of these skeletons.

LRH: Got that?

PC: Yeah.

PC: Acres of them.

LRH: Now let's have a little decayed flesh hanging on to the skeletons.

LRH: Acres of them?

PC: Okay.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Let's get the odor with it.

LRH: And now have them - have beautiful women, too, so you wouldn't have to even go through the trials of being a baby to become one.

PC: I can get an idea of it.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: You got the idea of the odor? All right. Let's keep putting them on there.

LRH: Got that?

Now let's have skeletons with bones missing.

PC: Yeah.

PC: Okay.

LRH: Got that? Well, put some protection around these.

LRH: Now the skulls missing.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: ... Okay.

LRH: Now on each one make sure that you paint the sign - of your own sign, insignia - as your property.

LRH: Skeletons with skulls missing.

PC: Yeah. Yeah.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Got that?

LRH: Good. Now skeletons with grave clothes hanging on them in tatters.

PC: Yes.

You don't like those grave clothes?

LRH: All right. Put a big sign over the gate about "sole proprietor."

PC: No!

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Well, have them...

LRII: Okay. Well, let's be about ten feet back of your head.

PC: I don't know what they look like, but I don't like them.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Oh? Well, how about having kind of decayed grave clothes?

LRH: Better ease on it?

PC: Yeah, I don't like those either.

PC: I like "Over" better than "in back."

LRH: Well, just have the pattern of the clothes still - imprints of clothes still stuck on the bones.

LRH: All right. Be a thousand feet up, then.

PC: Well, I'll bring the clothes if you say so, but I don't have to like them.

PC: Oh no. Don't rush to extremes!

LRH: You don't have to like them, huh? Well, let's have perfectly good clothes on them.

LRH: Okay.

PC: All right. A suit.

PC: Yes.

LRH: Huh?

LRH: Be above.

PC: A suit.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: You've got suits on them?

LRH: Now exteriorizing a little more easily?

PC: Yeah.

PC: Mm.

LRH: All right. Let's get lots of suits on them. Okay?

LRH: Mm? Now, what would you lack to exteriorize much better?

PC: Yes.

PC: Mm.

LRH: How about bringing the coffins along?

LRH: What do you think you might have?

PC: I got it.

PC: Perception.

LRH: Okay. Let's put on coffins for a while.

LRH: You might have some perception. What kind of perception do you want?

PC: Mm. hm.

PC: Visual mostly.

LRH: Let's put on more coffins.

LRH: Mm?

PC: Yeah.

PC: Visual is what I lack the most.

LRH: And more coffins. Oh, lots of good coffins. Are they pretty coffins or ordinary coffins?

LRH: Visual, huh?

PC: They're not pretty.

PC: The Seeing Eye dog is a little nearsighted.

LRH: They're not pretty. Kind of grisly?

LRH: Good. Well, let's take this visual idea now and let's find out what kind of looking you can have.

PC: Black.

PC: Well, fuzzy, to begin with.

LRH: Black?

LRH: Well, let's take very fuzzy looking.

PC: Yeah, and they - they do have a little scroll work around the edges.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: They do have, huh? Well, get that filled with mud.

LRH: Good. Fuzzy and blurry.

PC: Ah, sure, why not.

PC: Yes.

LRH: Okay. Now let's put grave mud around the coffins as you accept them.

LRH: And a limited number of objects.

PC: Grave mud.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Mm-hm. More of them. More of them.

LRH: Fuzzy, blurred. Now mock that up, mock up that kind of looking.

PC: Yeah. I could wash them though, if you want me to.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Yeah. Well, just get them all in grave mud.

LRH: And get yourself accepting it.

PC: Okay

PC: Yeah.

LRH: All right. Now have it dry mud, parched.

LRH: And let's get - accepting some more of it.

PC: Parched?

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Mm-hm. You know...

LRH: Let's get it foggy, fuzzy and blurred. Got that?

PC: Yeah, yeah.

PC: Yes.

LRH: ... real baked dry, real hard, and so forth.

LRH: Let's get some more of them.

Now, let's get skeletons again.

PC: Yes.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Now let's get a very limited number of objects that you can discern.

LRH: You - got enough skeletons?

PC: Yes. LRH: Let's mock up accepting it some more. Let's get lots of it.

PC: Hell, I had enough when I started.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Well, get just dust, then.

LRH: Okay. Let's take a look around now. Is that a little better or a little worse?

PC: Grave dust?

PC: Mm.

LRH: Mm-hm.

LRH: A little worse?

What happens as you do that?

PC: A little better.

PC: Well, I was trying to get the idea I might want it, but I don't.

LRH: A little better?

LRH: You don't want it at all. Well, okay. Let's just get plain, routine dead bodies. Can you?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Well, I get them.

LRH: All right. Let's get the kind of looking you would get through cataracts - through eye cataracts. Mm?

LRH: Well, get a few of them. Now get whole dead bodies.

PC: That's kind of blotchy and gloomy.

PC: These were whole.

LRH: You don't like that so good. You could have that.

LRH: Hm?

All right. Now, let's kind of get the kind of looking you'd get through great thick spectacles.

PC: These were whole.

PC: That's too clear.

LRJ: Mm-hm. Okay. Get bodies that are just dying. Get a lot of those - bodies just dying. Huh?

LRH: That's too clear? Well, get thick spectacles that have been stained almost black.

PC: Yeah, last gaspers.

PC: No.

LRH: Last gaspers. Good. Now let's get a lot of death rattles - goes along with that.

LRH: Well, how about mud splashed on them?

PC: I'm already getting those.

PC: No.

LRH: Good. Good. Good. All right. A few more.

LRH: No. What kind of looking would you say it was?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Just a little vague and distorted.

LRH: Now, let's get - let's get people who are about to die.

LRH: All right. Let's get distorted - distorted-vision lenses in these so they distort the vision. You know, blur the vision?

PC: Great pain?

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Mm-hm.

LRH: All right. Now let's accept a lot of those.

PC: Mm.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Great pain, that's right. A lot of those - about to die. Now, let's get people who are just about to have an accident which will give them great pain which will kill them.

LRH: Easy to do?

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: I'm not enthusiastic about it...

LRH: What happens as you do that?

LRH: Let's get other people accepting them, too. Just start throwing those things out into space and find out who they are acceptable to.

PC: Well, I Sort of got to figuring out what kind of accident they ought to have, so I got them - then I decided, well, hell, I'll get them about to have one and then I blew it there.

PC: I see quite a lot of people that are very curious to look through them.

LRH: Okay.

LRH: Oh, is this what's wrong with them? Yeah.

PC: They're just healthy people, that's all.

PC: They're like looking at a crazy house mirror or something.

LRH: They're just healthy people, huh?

LRH: Oh, I see. Well, get gauze to look through.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Gauze?

LRH: All right, let's get a lot of those. Now let's get them - that are going to live for a long time.

LRH: Mm-hm, gauze.

PC: Mm-hm.

PC: Mm.

LRH: You got that? Good shape?

LRH: Lots more gauze to look through.

PC: Mm, well, no, not particularly.

PC: No.

LRH: No? Well, let's just get people that are going to live for a long time. Now, let's go to - get people that are going to live a relatively unhappy life for a long time. Got that?

LRH: You don't like that? What do you like, then?

Now, let's get people who have been terribly offended by life.

PC: Just sort of musty vision, you know, sort of a - through a rain or a little foggy or...

PC: What would I want with those?

LRH: Good. Good.

LRH: Get a lot of them.

PC: ... something like that.

Now get a lot of them that are going to be happy about life.

LRH: Let's get it through a hard rain.

PC: Yep.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Now get a lot of them that are very attractive to women; and get the women who are attracted to them. You do that?

LRH: Get lots of vision through a hard rain now.

PC: Well, I guess I could if I knew what kind of guys were attractive to women and what - what their taste in women was.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Well, get women that just confound you by being attracted to the guys that you were getting.

LRH: More vision.

PC: All right. All right. I'll give it a try. I'll say that they're attracted to women.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: No, the women are attracted to them.

LRH: More vision now. More vision now. Now let the rain let up somewhat.

PC: That's - oh, I get the vision.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Mysterious - get this mysterious quality.

LRH: Now let it let up somewhat again.

Well, get all these bodies with this mysterious quality which attracts the opposite sex. Got them?

PC: Mm-mm.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Okay. Now get what would happen to you, where you are there, if you suddenly did take a look.

LRH: Okay.

[End of tape. This session continues in the next lecture.]

PC: I got all kinds of guys.

LRH: All kinds of them. Well, just keep getting them and putting them on.

Okay. Now, just as a little experiment here, let's be a quarter of an inch away from the body. You do that?

PC: I don't seem to.

LRH: You don't seem to. Well, get the fact that you can control the body from where you are.

PC: Partly

LRH: What do you mean, "partly"?

PC: There are some things about it I don't control to my satisfaction.

LRH: Oh, really?

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Hm. Okay.

[to audience] There is an indicated channel of processing right there. Whatever else this has done, simply led up to a very good diagnosis.

Okay. You got all these bodies?

PC: Yeah.

LRH: All right. Smash them in and explode them.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Did they explode real good?

PC: Yeah, a little white burst in the stomach.

LRH: All in the stomach? Okay. Now let's get the two rear corners of the room.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Got them?

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: All right. Let's hold on to them.

What happens if you do that?

PC: Well, I have a hard time holding them.

LRH: Really? Harder than usual?

PC: No.

LRH: Easier than usual?

PC: No.

LRH: Just about the same?

PC: Yeah, I found out something the other day: that I wasn't holding the corners, I was holding the memory of them.

LRH: Who told you that?

PC: Nobody, I found it out.

LRH: All right, let's hold on to the memory of them for a while.

PC: I'm not now.

LRH: Oh, you're not doing it now?

PC: No.

LRH: Well, good enough. Good enough. Just hold on to those corners. Okay. Let's come up to present time.

PC: The way it - the way it is - I'm getting better at it, but I have to keep putting my attention back on it.

LRH: Hm.

PC: Because I found out that by looking at the wall - kind of trying to, through the side of my head - that the attention just went that fast off of it.

LRH: Hm.

PC: And then I'd sit there for a long time thinking I was looking at it, just remembering it.

LRH: Mm-hm.

PC: Oh, for crying out loud!

LRH: Click, bang!

[to audience] Okay. Well, now, here is your indicated processes. But remember, these are processes which better expose mechanisms than they are processes which go directly to the root of a situation and clear it off.

These are all usable processes, you understand that, and they're not necessarily the recommended processes. It's again over on 8-L - let's learn about life. Okay?

Now, in any such process, you are dealing, of course, with a relatively subjective reality. Remember, the preclear only takes so much of it. Remember also that you can build back all the dynamics with this process, and so on.

This process which I was using on recovering perception is not a subjective process, however. We were combining, in this case, Acceptance Level Processing and perception. I kept asking her, "How does it look? How does it look?" Well, it keeps putting her attention out. But it also keeps putting the question into her mind there might be something wrong with her looking.

So, why don't you take me here, as questioning how you're looking, and take my body and flip it around - put it on several times as the answer to how you're looking.

You got that? Tell me, did you feel any uncertainty lift on it?

PC: Not on that, no.

LRH: Who is it that will do that?

PC: What?

LRH: Let's mock up any kind of a figure out here that's uncertain about how you're looking and put it on.

PC: Every relative I've got.

LRH: They're all uncertain about how you're looking?

PC: On sense of seeing, yeah.

LRH: On sense of seeing? Well, Q and A. Q and A while exteriorized. Now let's put these relatives as the answer to how you're looking, on you as a thetan, every time.

PC: Yes.

LU!: [to audience] You can run all the subjective processes you want on somebody that's outside. It won't do anything bad. Get them?

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: One after the other. Got them?

PC: Mm-hm. I see more I can run through. There are quite a few of them.

LRH: There's quite a few of them.

PC: Yes.

LRH: Does that bring up a sense of anything?

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Yeah. Q and A.

PC: The sense of idiocy, yes.

LRH: Huh?

PC: A sense of complete idiocy.

LRH: Yeah.

[to audience] There's a thousand ways to change a thetan's postulates; a thousand ways to change them, just thousands of ways. Actually, the only process, in the final analysis on the thing, is the change of postulate.

Many times a thetan is inhibited in changing postulates by the fact that he has to weave his way through communication systems. So actually, it is the communication system itself which is impeding him.

The only thing you have ever been punished for, really, actually, was Communicating. If you were punished for no communications, it was because you'd communicated in the first place. Got that?

The only thing you were ever punished for was Communicating. That's the only thing this society ever punishes anybody for is putting out an anchor point. And the whole universe is violent on this subject. "Don't put out any anchor points around here!" Because, of course, if you start putting out anchor points, there wouldn't be any universe and you'd have your own and they'd lose a recruit.

How are you held in the trap? Just that - anchor points.

Okay?

[end of lecture.]